Taking note of rising bad loans, the Supreme
Court on Tuesday in Centre for
Public Interest Litigation v Housing & Urban Development Corporation Ltd [MANU/SC/0014/2017] asked the Centre to give the list
of corporate entities against whom outstanding loans were in excess of Rs 500
crore, besides the empirical data on recovery cases pending for last ten years
in debt recovery tribunals (DRTs) and their appellate bodies. A bench
comprising Chief Justice T S Thakur and Justices A M Khanwilkar and D Y Chandrachud
rued the lack of infrastructure and manpower at DRTs and debt recovery
appellate tribunals (DRATs), which decide recovery cases and said the
legislative changes on fast disposal of such matters will not yield results
unless infrastructure is not "commensurate" with the burden of work.
The Bench has also asked the Centre
to file an affidavit dealing with various issues and sought "empirical
data on the pendency of cases for more than ten years and the list of corporate
entities where the amount outstanding is in excess of Rs 500 crore". The
court asked "whether the timelines set down in the amended legislation are
capable of being achieved with the existing infrastructure including judicial
personnel and staffing pattern of the debt recovery tribunals and debt recovery
appellate tribunals".
Union Government has been asked by
the Apex Court to file an affidavit specifically dealing with the following
issues within a period of four weeks from the date of Judgement:
(i) Whether the timelines set down in
the amended legislation are capable of being achieved with the existing
infrastructure including judicial personnel and staffing pattern of the Debt
Recovery Tribunals and Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunals;
(ii) The underlying basis, if any,
upon which the revised timelines have been stipulated and whether any
scientific study has been conducted on the availability of infrastructure;
(iii) Whether, and if so, what steps
the Union government intends to adopt to enhance the infrastructure of Debt
Recovery Tribunals and the Appellate Tribunals in terms of physical
infrastructure, judicial manpower and non-judicial personnel required for the
efficacious functioning of the Tribunals;
(iv) The specific plan of action
including time-schedules within which the existing infrastructure would be
upgraded so as to achieve the time frame for disposal indicated in the amended
legislation; and
(v) Empirical data on the pendency of
cases for more than ten years and the list of corporate entities where the
amount outstanding is in excess of Rs. 500 crore.
No comments:
Post a Comment